SPOILERS!!!
I saw Harry Potter and the Cursed Child in London in July. The staging, the effects, and the actors were absolutely fabulous. Seeing Jamie Parker on stage is amazing. He IS Harry in a three-piece suit, and I love him for it.
However, this story is an absolute mess. It contradicts canon in multiple places. It feels like the clumsiest sort of fan service: let's do this because we know readers like this character, not because it serves the plot! Let's make this story a new one abou
t Harry as a dad - but let's spend the entire play focusing on the events of books 1-7 instead. It was really crazy. After the first night, my friends and I spent a couple hours talking out our feelings. "Can it bounce back? Is there a way for it to ... fix itself?" The answer is no. This is a terrible story foisted on an excellent cast.
The line that best sums up the play for me is this: [Harry takes Albus to Cedric's grave and mentions that he goes there every year on his death.
HARRY: He could have been anything. He could have been an Auror. He could have played Quidditch for England. He could have been anything.
Yes! That's true. He could have been ANY OF THE TWO WIZARDING CAREERS WE KNEW ABOUT IN 2008. This line made me actually laugh out loud in the theater. This play was supposed to expand the Harry Potter universe. Instead it contracted it. If they had nothing to say about Harry and real-life struggles [instead of blah blah Voldemort is back , why even bother?
I am 1000% disappointed and hope that JK has plausible deniability.
User Reviews: